Talk:Ham: Difference between revisions
Justjoe4life (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Limericklad (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Come on people, make sure your articles on the downfall of space monkeys is accurate and well-sourced... we don't want to look ridiculous. [[User:justjoe4life|Scott Hanson]] | Come on people, make sure your articles on the downfall of space monkeys is accurate and well-sourced... we don't want to look ridiculous. [[User:justjoe4life|Scott Hanson]] | ||
hmmm, i wasn't sure SiK... I thought it went without saying that it was untrue but if you want to edit that in it's cool... thanks for the clean up and pic people. It actually annoyed me as I logged off last night cos I remembered i forgot to do the links to the videos and blog - LL | |||
Revision as of 02:11, 29 June 2008
i think this is a great article. i'd like to see a little bit more clarity though between karl's version and the "real" version. i think it's important to include some opener in the 2nd section such as According to Karl ... so it doesn't look as if we are saying this is definitely the story. Steve is King 17:39, 28 June 2008 (BST)
Come on people, make sure your articles on the downfall of space monkeys is accurate and well-sourced... we don't want to look ridiculous. Scott Hanson
hmmm, i wasn't sure SiK... I thought it went without saying that it was untrue but if you want to edit that in it's cool... thanks for the clean up and pic people. It actually annoyed me as I logged off last night cos I remembered i forgot to do the links to the videos and blog - LL