Talk:Adolf Hitler: Difference between revisions

From [[Main_Page|Pilkipedia]], the Karl Pilkington encyclopaedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (New page: I'm not quite sure why the 'clarification' needs to be there. --Taco)
 
mNo edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
I'm not quite sure why the 'clarification' needs to be there. --[[User:t__a__c__o|Taco]]
I'm not quite sure why the 'clarification' needs to be there. Also, it's not an excerpt, it's just a cleaned up version of Karl's effort on the show to inform people about Hitler. Or maybe we should put this in a different category all together? Say, a category called "According to Karl Pilkington". In that way, a lot of his theories and his versions of the truth can be added to the Wiki, without having to stick to the truth. I for one, like this description of Adolf H. better then whatever they've conjured up on the REAL Wikipedia. --[[User:t__a__c__o|Taco]]
*gotcha.  ok... hm ... well, we do have a 'karl's theories' category now, but i'm not sure this fits in as a theory, but perhaps something similar can be added.  i can't think of how to categorise it.  but without some kind of clarification it's a little confusing because we don't have any other articles that are written from Karl's POV, like as if he wrote them.  i love this article - it's great to have it on here. [[User:Steve is King|Steve is King]] 13:28, 18 October 2007 (BST)
** It IS hard to categorize it. Rather then thinking of a new category, maybe we should focus on how to merge this with the 'Karl's theories' category, and come to one 'According to Karl' categorization.  --[[User:t__a__c__o|Taco]]

Latest revision as of 12:40, 18 October 2007

I'm not quite sure why the 'clarification' needs to be there. Also, it's not an excerpt, it's just a cleaned up version of Karl's effort on the show to inform people about Hitler. Or maybe we should put this in a different category all together? Say, a category called "According to Karl Pilkington". In that way, a lot of his theories and his versions of the truth can be added to the Wiki, without having to stick to the truth. I for one, like this description of Adolf H. better then whatever they've conjured up on the REAL Wikipedia. --Taco

  • gotcha. ok... hm ... well, we do have a 'karl's theories' category now, but i'm not sure this fits in as a theory, but perhaps something similar can be added. i can't think of how to categorise it. but without some kind of clarification it's a little confusing because we don't have any other articles that are written from Karl's POV, like as if he wrote them. i love this article - it's great to have it on here. Steve is King 13:28, 18 October 2007 (BST)
    • It IS hard to categorize it. Rather then thinking of a new category, maybe we should focus on how to merge this with the 'Karl's theories' category, and come to one 'According to Karl' categorization. --Taco