Talk:Adolf Hitler: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (New page: I'm not quite sure why the 'clarification' needs to be there. --Taco) |
mNo edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I'm not quite sure why the 'clarification' needs to be there. --[[User:t__a__c__o|Taco]] | I'm not quite sure why the 'clarification' needs to be there. Also, it's not an excerpt, it's just a cleaned up version of Karl's effort on the show to inform people about Hitler. Or maybe we should put this in a different category all together? Say, a category called "According to Karl Pilkington". In that way, a lot of his theories and his versions of the truth can be added to the Wiki, without having to stick to the truth. I for one, like this description of Adolf H. better then whatever they've conjured up on the REAL Wikipedia. --[[User:t__a__c__o|Taco]] | ||
*gotcha. ok... hm ... well, we do have a 'karl's theories' category now, but i'm not sure this fits in as a theory, but perhaps something similar can be added. i can't think of how to categorise it. but without some kind of clarification it's a little confusing because we don't have any other articles that are written from Karl's POV, like as if he wrote them. i love this article - it's great to have it on here. [[User:Steve is King|Steve is King]] 13:28, 18 October 2007 (BST) | |||
** It IS hard to categorize it. Rather then thinking of a new category, maybe we should focus on how to merge this with the 'Karl's theories' category, and come to one 'According to Karl' categorization. --[[User:t__a__c__o|Taco]] | |||
Latest revision as of 12:40, 18 October 2007
I'm not quite sure why the 'clarification' needs to be there. Also, it's not an excerpt, it's just a cleaned up version of Karl's effort on the show to inform people about Hitler. Or maybe we should put this in a different category all together? Say, a category called "According to Karl Pilkington". In that way, a lot of his theories and his versions of the truth can be added to the Wiki, without having to stick to the truth. I for one, like this description of Adolf H. better then whatever they've conjured up on the REAL Wikipedia. --Taco
- gotcha. ok... hm ... well, we do have a 'karl's theories' category now, but i'm not sure this fits in as a theory, but perhaps something similar can be added. i can't think of how to categorise it. but without some kind of clarification it's a little confusing because we don't have any other articles that are written from Karl's POV, like as if he wrote them. i love this article - it's great to have it on here. Steve is King 13:28, 18 October 2007 (BST)
- It IS hard to categorize it. Rather then thinking of a new category, maybe we should focus on how to merge this with the 'Karl's theories' category, and come to one 'According to Karl' categorization. --Taco