Talk:Warwick Davis: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Knockinabout (talk | contribs) (New page: Nice to inject humor now and again, but this is rather unencyclopedic. Not that I could do much better.--~~~~) |
Knockinabout (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Nice to inject humor now and again, but this is rather unencyclopedic. Not that I could do much better.--[[User:Knockinabout|Knockinabout]] 00:55, 14 August 2007 (EDT) | Nice to inject humor now and again, but this is rather unencyclopedic. Not that I could do much better.--[[User:Knockinabout|Knockinabout]] 00:55, 14 August 2007 (EDT) | ||
Personally, I think it's fine to be humourous on these minor people pages. We only need to explain who they are in relation to the Pilki-verse rather than a serious lengthy page on how well they did at drama school and all of their acting roles. [[User:SmugglingSeaweed|SmugglingSeaweed]] | |||
Agree. I'd rather have Pilki-verse than arbitrary background information.--[[User:Knockinabout|Knockinabout]] 22:26, 14 August 2007 (EDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 02:26, 15 August 2007
Nice to inject humor now and again, but this is rather unencyclopedic. Not that I could do much better.--Knockinabout 00:55, 14 August 2007 (EDT)
Personally, I think it's fine to be humourous on these minor people pages. We only need to explain who they are in relation to the Pilki-verse rather than a serious lengthy page on how well they did at drama school and all of their acting roles. SmugglingSeaweed
Agree. I'd rather have Pilki-verse than arbitrary background information.--Knockinabout 22:26, 14 August 2007 (EDT)