Talk:Karl's Brother: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
(I think) |
||
(6 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
SH. | SH. | ||
: i'm sorry KA, you know i love you, but that's not karl's brother. SiK | : i'm sorry KA, you know i love you, but that's not karl's brother. SiK | ||
SH, i need you as tiebreaker. i, being a sensible and intelligent human being, vote the newspaper article be forever removed entirely. KA, being a whimsical fool, thinks it's 2 legit 2 quit. what say you? [[User:Steve is King|Steve is King]] 22:15, 21 August 2008 (BST) | |||
Present the facts, let the reader make up their mind. Skepticism innit? There's no definitive language in the article. It presents it as speculation. A user can click on the link to the image and go "Nah" or "Hmm, could be". What right do we have for them to not make their own mind up and bury this enigma forever in the past?--[[User:Knockinabout|Knockinabout]] 22:33, 21 August 2008 (BST) | |||
Argh, fuck you both.--[[User:Knockinabout|Knockinabout]] 22:34, 21 August 2008 (BST) | |||
Don't give me that "teach the controversy" creationist bullshit KA! There are loads of Mark Pilkingtons in their forties scattered around England, if we put everyone of em up and "let people make up their own mind" then the page would go on forever. SH 22:37 | |||
(;)) --[[User:Knockinabout|Knockinabout]] 22:45, 21 August 2008 (BST) | |||
== I think == | |||
its karls brother on the new tv show on channel 4 "Benefit busters". He is just like karl, he is called, obviously, Mark Pilkington, he was in the army for a long time, he was in jail for a small amount of time (Karl said he was a bit of a bad un) and it seems rather close if you ask me. Sorry if this is a double post, I seem to have lost the ability to use the internets at the mo. |
Latest revision as of 00:02, 28 August 2009
Could be renamed Mark Pilkington ? ArtVandelay13 15:12, 7 April 2008 (BST)
Is this front page news-worthy? Didn't we have one on Suzanne's head? I can't remember.--Knockinabout 15:58, 12 April 2008 (BST)
I'd think it was worthy if it was actually him, rather than some bloke called Mark Pilkington from Manchester, 99% unlikely to be directly related to Karl. Not that I'm skeptical or anything. SH.
- i'm sorry KA, you know i love you, but that's not karl's brother. SiK
SH, i need you as tiebreaker. i, being a sensible and intelligent human being, vote the newspaper article be forever removed entirely. KA, being a whimsical fool, thinks it's 2 legit 2 quit. what say you? Steve is King 22:15, 21 August 2008 (BST)
Present the facts, let the reader make up their mind. Skepticism innit? There's no definitive language in the article. It presents it as speculation. A user can click on the link to the image and go "Nah" or "Hmm, could be". What right do we have for them to not make their own mind up and bury this enigma forever in the past?--Knockinabout 22:33, 21 August 2008 (BST)
Argh, fuck you both.--Knockinabout 22:34, 21 August 2008 (BST)
Don't give me that "teach the controversy" creationist bullshit KA! There are loads of Mark Pilkingtons in their forties scattered around England, if we put everyone of em up and "let people make up their own mind" then the page would go on forever. SH 22:37
(;)) --Knockinabout 22:45, 21 August 2008 (BST)
I think
its karls brother on the new tv show on channel 4 "Benefit busters". He is just like karl, he is called, obviously, Mark Pilkington, he was in the army for a long time, he was in jail for a small amount of time (Karl said he was a bit of a bad un) and it seems rather close if you ask me. Sorry if this is a double post, I seem to have lost the ability to use the internets at the mo.