Talk:Monkey News: Difference between revisions
Limericklad (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Brillant idea, you are welcome to get started. This section certainly does need alot of work since it was one of the most popular features, apart from [[Rockbusters]]. Don't worry about it being scrappy looking or anything. It is more important about getting the information down. The forums section on the Pilkipedia might have some information to get started. --[[User:Number86|Number86]] | Brillant idea, you are welcome to get started. This section certainly does need alot of work since it was one of the most popular features, apart from [[Rockbusters]]. Don't worry about it being scrappy looking or anything. It is more important about getting the information down. The forums section on the Pilkipedia might have some information to get started. --[[User:Number86|Number86]] | ||
Is the "Famous Monkey" section the place to post factual research on *any* monkey news monkeys or just a summary section for the monkeys most often referenced throughout the shows? I've done a bit of monkey research on the monkey astronaut trainer but certainly don't consider that one to be famous. -- [[User:Bret|Bret]] | |||
could i just reorganise the list of monkey news items into series not year. I don't see the point in doing it by year. --[[User:Limericklad|Limericklad]] 15:58, 23 August 2008 (BST) | could i just reorganise the list of monkey news items into series not year. I don't see the point in doing it by year. --[[User:Limericklad|Limericklad]] 15:58, 23 August 2008 (BST) | ||
by series makes a lot moar sense. go for it fo shizz--[[User:Knockinabout|Knockinabout]] 19:21, 23 August 2008 (BST) | |||
Latest revision as of 03:21, 1 May 2010
I think that there should be a section on this page about famous monkeys and short explainations etc.
Brillant idea, you are welcome to get started. This section certainly does need alot of work since it was one of the most popular features, apart from Rockbusters. Don't worry about it being scrappy looking or anything. It is more important about getting the information down. The forums section on the Pilkipedia might have some information to get started. --Number86
Is the "Famous Monkey" section the place to post factual research on *any* monkey news monkeys or just a summary section for the monkeys most often referenced throughout the shows? I've done a bit of monkey research on the monkey astronaut trainer but certainly don't consider that one to be famous. -- Bret
could i just reorganise the list of monkey news items into series not year. I don't see the point in doing it by year. --Limericklad 15:58, 23 August 2008 (BST)
by series makes a lot moar sense. go for it fo shizz--Knockinabout 19:21, 23 August 2008 (BST)