Talk:Audible.com: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
if we do, i will heed to yous lots better judgment, but it just seems abit excesive to me- it dosent really fit in with the length we've attributed to other articles of similar rskelevance--[[User:Chinchilla|Chinchilla]] 23:09, 7 October 2007 (BST) | if we do, i will heed to yous lots better judgment, but it just seems abit excesive to me- it dosent really fit in with the length we've attributed to other articles of similar rskelevance--[[User:Chinchilla|Chinchilla]] 23:09, 7 October 2007 (BST) | ||
*definitely too much. could be wiped altogether or cut down to a very short article. [[User:Steve is King|Steve is King]] 00:49, 8 October 2007 (BST) | *definitely too much. could be wiped altogether or cut down to a very short article. [[User:Steve is King|Steve is King]] 00:49, 8 October 2007 (BST) | ||
i butchered it good n proper....if anyone disagrees.......too bad (or put it all back if you really think it needs to be here)--[[User:Chinchilla|Chinchilla]] 22:05, 8 October 2007 (BST) | |||
* stop being such an insecure wimp. you're doing great. [[User:Steve is King|Steve is King]] 00:35, 9 October 2007 (BST) | |||
Latest revision as of 23:35, 8 October 2007
do we need all this?
if we do, i will heed to yous lots better judgment, but it just seems abit excesive to me- it dosent really fit in with the length we've attributed to other articles of similar rskelevance--Chinchilla 23:09, 7 October 2007 (BST)
- definitely too much. could be wiped altogether or cut down to a very short article. Steve is King 00:49, 8 October 2007 (BST)
i butchered it good n proper....if anyone disagrees.......too bad (or put it all back if you really think it needs to be here)--Chinchilla 22:05, 8 October 2007 (BST)
- stop being such an insecure wimp. you're doing great. Steve is King 00:35, 9 October 2007 (BST)