Talk:FHM: Difference between revisions

From [[Main_Page|Pilkipedia]], the Karl Pilkington encyclopaedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
mNo edit summary
No edit summary
Line 8: Line 8:


::The way I understood, FHM published the book/magazine that Karl had. Again, it's my opinion that if the article doesn't mention or is not connected to RSK universe or fandom, axe it (or make it relate to it). -KnockinAbout
::The way I understood, FHM published the book/magazine that Karl had. Again, it's my opinion that if the article doesn't mention or is not connected to RSK universe or fandom, axe it (or make it relate to it). -KnockinAbout
There was a dead link to it the other day, so i decided to fill it in. Delete it if you want though, it's not exactly a vital page.

Revision as of 08:37, 14 August 2007

can someone tell me how this is applicable to RSK? i'm missing something ... Steve is King 21:14, 13 August 2007 (EDT)

Don't know. Sounds familiar (like maybe something that had to do with Steve), but this is what links to it:
If there's anything that fascinates Karl more than monkeys, it's freaks. His favourite film is The Elephant Man, and his prized posession is a little book of freaks from FHM which he carries everyhwere. (from the Cheeky Freak of the Week page)
That can't be right, unless FHM is also a store in England? --Squeek 00:22, 14 August 2007 (EDT)
The way I understood, FHM published the book/magazine that Karl had. Again, it's my opinion that if the article doesn't mention or is not connected to RSK universe or fandom, axe it (or make it relate to it). -KnockinAbout


There was a dead link to it the other day, so i decided to fill it in. Delete it if you want though, it's not exactly a vital page.