Talk:1 Leicester Square: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
if there wern't so many brandites around here i may even suggest it needs to be slimmed- i bet we dont have pages like this for other talk show's the trio (ie ricky) have been on--[[User:Chinchilla|Chinchilla]] 11:53, 22 October 2007 (BST) | if there wern't so many brandites around here i may even suggest it needs to be slimmed- i bet we dont have pages like this for other talk show's the trio (ie ricky) have been on--[[User:Chinchilla|Chinchilla]] 11:53, 22 October 2007 (BST) | ||
:true enough. per usual, chinch, go right ahead! [[User:Steve is King|Steve is King]] 12:11, 22 October 2007 (BST) | :true enough. per usual, chinch, go right ahead! [[User:Steve is King|Steve is King]] 12:11, 22 October 2007 (BST) | ||
::I don't really see the point of removing info from the wiki. Isn't it counter-productive? [[User:WikiSysop|WikiSysop]] 12:41, 22 October 2007 (BST) | |||
Revision as of 11:41, 22 October 2007
omg ... i can't believe nigel wrote this article. it is painstakingly tedious! it's kind of funny that it came from the man himself. :) it couldn't be more descriptive unless it also included that russell occasionally breathed in and out. Steve is King 21:24, 21 August 2007 (EDT)
if there wern't so many brandites around here i may even suggest it needs to be slimmed- i bet we dont have pages like this for other talk show's the trio (ie ricky) have been on--Chinchilla 11:53, 22 October 2007 (BST)
- true enough. per usual, chinch, go right ahead! Steve is King 12:11, 22 October 2007 (BST)
- I don't really see the point of removing info from the wiki. Isn't it counter-productive? WikiSysop 12:41, 22 October 2007 (BST)