Talk:1 Leicester Square: Difference between revisions
Chinchilla (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Chinchilla (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
you are right in as much as, once it is here we get nothing out of taking it down- i just think the place would look lovely and professional if we kept articles with the same relevence at the same length- like the jonathan ross show/ricjhard and judy- that ricky has been on more than this- this is a work in progress innit so maybe it would be a more 'positvely chargedated idea' if instead we agreed to make them articles larger. I think we ought to keep artcles to a sensible length though- it can be a whaste of time- if we just outline the rskelevance and then link it to wikipedia?- most people are innately lazy and will not bother reading a large artcle, i just worry that instead of being all nice n balanced our brand area is streching our pivot and he could bring the whole of us down into shark infested waters, dont get em weong i like him n that but, hold on i have lost my point- hope you lot have some luck trying to find it in there somewhere--[[User:Chinchilla|Chinchilla]] 18:00, 22 October 2007 (BST) | you are right in as much as, once it is here we get nothing out of taking it down- i just think the place would look lovely and professional if we kept articles with the same relevence at the same length- like the jonathan ross show/ricjhard and judy- that ricky has been on more than this- this is a work in progress innit so maybe it would be a more 'positvely chargedated idea' if instead we agreed to make them articles larger. I think we ought to keep artcles to a sensible length though- it can be a whaste of time- if we just outline the rskelevance and then link it to wikipedia?- most people are innately lazy and will not bother reading a large artcle, i just worry that instead of being all nice n balanced our brand area is streching our pivot and he could bring the whole of us down into shark infested waters, dont get em weong i like him n that but, hold on i have lost my point- hope you lot have some luck trying to find it in there somewhere--[[User:Chinchilla|Chinchilla]] 18:00, 22 October 2007 (BST) | ||
ps- i wont change it --[[User:Chinchilla|Chinchilla]] 18:00, 22 October 2007 (BST) | |||
Revision as of 17:00, 22 October 2007
omg ... i can't believe nigel wrote this article. it is painstakingly tedious! it's kind of funny that it came from the man himself. :) it couldn't be more descriptive unless it also included that russell occasionally breathed in and out. Steve is King 21:24, 21 August 2007 (EDT)
if there wern't so many brandites around here i may even suggest it needs to be slimmed- i bet we dont have pages like this for other talk show's the trio (ie ricky) have been on--Chinchilla 11:53, 22 October 2007 (BST)
- true enough. per usual, chinch, go right ahead! Steve is King 12:11, 22 October 2007 (BST)
- I don't really see the point of removing info from the wiki. Isn't it counter-productive? WikiSysop 12:41, 22 October 2007 (BST)
you are right in as much as, once it is here we get nothing out of taking it down- i just think the place would look lovely and professional if we kept articles with the same relevence at the same length- like the jonathan ross show/ricjhard and judy- that ricky has been on more than this- this is a work in progress innit so maybe it would be a more 'positvely chargedated idea' if instead we agreed to make them articles larger. I think we ought to keep artcles to a sensible length though- it can be a whaste of time- if we just outline the rskelevance and then link it to wikipedia?- most people are innately lazy and will not bother reading a large artcle, i just worry that instead of being all nice n balanced our brand area is streching our pivot and he could bring the whole of us down into shark infested waters, dont get em weong i like him n that but, hold on i have lost my point- hope you lot have some luck trying to find it in there somewhere--Chinchilla 18:00, 22 October 2007 (BST)
ps- i wont change it --Chinchilla 18:00, 22 October 2007 (BST)