Template talk:Latest News: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
* thanks for the input. thrilled to have help and you're doing great! i haven't been sticking with 1-week article attacks as it is ... i keep them as the subject until they're at least decent, and i did think extras needed a bit more help. good to know that someone else thinks so too. :) and like with all the articles, really, even after it's no longer the article attack, it can and should continue to be edited as needed and as people are able. cheers. | * thanks for the input. thrilled to have help and you're doing great! i haven't been sticking with 1-week article attacks as it is ... i keep them as the subject until they're at least decent, and i did think extras needed a bit more help. good to know that someone else thinks so too. :) and like with all the articles, really, even after it's no longer the article attack, it can and should continue to be edited as needed and as people are able. cheers. | ||
* i'll be honest ... i'm a teeny bit nervous about advertising the FAME podcast, too. i asked nigel about it but haven't heard back. you've written that it's totally legal so i WANT to believe that but i'm a tad incredulous and really just naive about what is and isn't kosher with such things. you sure it's all right? [[User:Steve is King|Steve is King]] 22:24, 6 September 2007 (EDT) | * i'll be honest ... i'm a teeny bit nervous about advertising the FAME podcast, too. i asked nigel about it but haven't heard back. you've written that it's totally legal so i WANT to believe that but i'm a tad incredulous and really just naive about what is and isn't kosher with such things. you sure it's all right? [[User:Steve is King|Steve is King]] 22:24, 6 September 2007 (EDT) | ||
If Ricky Gervais says it's fine to download it off the internet as it was free anyway, then I think it's alright to put on the wiki. [[User:SmugglingSeaweed|SmugglingSeaweed]] | |||
Revision as of 09:16, 7 September 2007
nice work, SS. the only thing is ... i'm not sure those links to the golden years work anymore. have you tried them recently? Steve is King 15:35, 6 September 2007 (EDT)
I was so pleased that I've got the hang of editing templates and uploading images properly I didn't check the links, sorry. I'll continue to do the news (it obviously makes a difference, The Golden Years thread got about 10 new posts since I did the news, and the free podcast news got a lot of users with like 1-20 posts in who probably wouldn't have heard about it for a while otherwise) and make sure everything is valid in future. Oh, and while we're both here, can you keep Extras as the Article Attack for next week please. There's much more to be done on it yet. I started college this week so I haven't had much energy to edit, but I'll do as much as I can on the Extras section over the weekend, although it still won't be completed. SmugglingSeaweed
- thanks for the input. thrilled to have help and you're doing great! i haven't been sticking with 1-week article attacks as it is ... i keep them as the subject until they're at least decent, and i did think extras needed a bit more help. good to know that someone else thinks so too. :) and like with all the articles, really, even after it's no longer the article attack, it can and should continue to be edited as needed and as people are able. cheers.
- i'll be honest ... i'm a teeny bit nervous about advertising the FAME podcast, too. i asked nigel about it but haven't heard back. you've written that it's totally legal so i WANT to believe that but i'm a tad incredulous and really just naive about what is and isn't kosher with such things. you sure it's all right? Steve is King 22:24, 6 September 2007 (EDT)
If Ricky Gervais says it's fine to download it off the internet as it was free anyway, then I think it's alright to put on the wiki. SmugglingSeaweed