Talk:John Noel: Difference between revisions

From [[Main_Page|Pilkipedia]], the Karl Pilkington encyclopaedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
...and karl pilkington?....surely, i wont change it incase there is a reason that he's been left out...ok i got bored and changed it....i don't think i'm wrong and given this is a karl encyclopedia
...and karl pilkington?....surely, i wont change it incase there is a reason that he's been left out...ok i got bored and changed it....i don't think i'm wrong and given this is a karl encyclopedia
you're right, chinch.  KP should be preeminent.  i think we can beef this article up a bit, too.  also .... i'm not sure we need a trevor lock article.  he's too removed from RSK, i think.  i wanted to do a matt morgan one but couldn't really justify it.  russell brand worked with karl and ricky, and interviewed steve, but trev and matt are at least 1 person removed from them.  i think??  for now at least ??  [[User:Steve is King|Steve is King]] 08:04, 9 September 2007 (EDT)

Revision as of 12:04, 9 September 2007

...and karl pilkington?....surely, i wont change it incase there is a reason that he's been left out...ok i got bored and changed it....i don't think i'm wrong and given this is a karl encyclopedia


you're right, chinch. KP should be preeminent. i think we can beef this article up a bit, too. also .... i'm not sure we need a trevor lock article. he's too removed from RSK, i think. i wanted to do a matt morgan one but couldn't really justify it. russell brand worked with karl and ricky, and interviewed steve, but trev and matt are at least 1 person removed from them. i think?? for now at least ?? Steve is King 08:04, 9 September 2007 (EDT)