Talk:Audible.com: Difference between revisions

From [[Main_Page|Pilkipedia]], the Karl Pilkington encyclopaedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
if we do, i will heed to yous lots better judgment, but it just seems abit excesive to me- it dosent really fit in with the length we've attributed to other articles of similar rskelevance--[[User:Chinchilla|Chinchilla]] 23:09, 7 October 2007 (BST)
if we do, i will heed to yous lots better judgment, but it just seems abit excesive to me- it dosent really fit in with the length we've attributed to other articles of similar rskelevance--[[User:Chinchilla|Chinchilla]] 23:09, 7 October 2007 (BST)
*definitely too much.  could be wiped altogether or cut down to a very short article. [[User:Steve is King|Steve is King]] 00:49, 8 October 2007 (BST)
*definitely too much.  could be wiped altogether or cut down to a very short article. [[User:Steve is King|Steve is King]] 00:49, 8 October 2007 (BST)
i butchered it good n proper....if anyone disagrees.......too bad (or put it all back if you really think it needs to be here)--[[User:Chinchilla|Chinchilla]] 22:05, 8 October 2007 (BST)

Revision as of 21:05, 8 October 2007

do we need all this?

if we do, i will heed to yous lots better judgment, but it just seems abit excesive to me- it dosent really fit in with the length we've attributed to other articles of similar rskelevance--Chinchilla 23:09, 7 October 2007 (BST)

  • definitely too much. could be wiped altogether or cut down to a very short article. Steve is King 00:49, 8 October 2007 (BST)


i butchered it good n proper....if anyone disagrees.......too bad (or put it all back if you really think it needs to be here)--Chinchilla 22:05, 8 October 2007 (BST)